T3QML/PDEAerospace & SpaceManufacturing
Aerodynamic / CFD design
PDE-class fluid dynamics — FTQC-gated; classical HPC dominates today.
Sector
Aerospace design
Likely buyer
Aerospace OEMs
Hardware gate
FTQC-era
Taxonomy
cost-prohibitive × accelerating
No live demo yet — PDE/CFD needs fault-tolerant hardware. The paradigm-honest position: this use case is demonstrated with crossover analysis, not theater.
GTM talk track
Honesty gate: say classical wins today.
OGSM — product operating frame
Objective
Watching brief.
Goals
- Track quantum-PDE research
Strategies
- Monitor
Measures
- N/A
OBR — outcome-based roadmap
| Horizon | Outcome we create | Buyer behavior change | Result we measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Now | Educate | Prospect runs the emulated demo on their own instance data | Booked QPU-time evaluation or paid pilot |
| Next | Revisit at FTQC | Prospect co-designs a scoped benchmark against their incumbent solver | Documented crossover curve; expansion to production instances |
| Later | Reassess | Prospect standardizes on the workflow or buys an on-prem system | Recurring QPU consumption / system sale; reference case |
Fit notes (honesty gate)
PDE solvers are a fault-tolerant-era story.
Ready to run this on real hardware?
Emulation-verified today — the same program runs on a Pasqal QPU unchanged.