T2HAMGovernment & Public SectorEnergy & UtilitiesAdvanced Materials
Climate / carbon-capture materials + siting
Dual: capture-materials simulation (T2) plus storage-site selection (T1 siting).
Sector
Climate tech
Likely buyer
Climate-tech firms; energy majors; governments
Hardware gate
Materials → QPU; siting → Orion/Vela
Taxonomy
capability-absent × enabling
Live demo — adiabatic sweep on 5 sites
Ω 9.4 · δ ±12.6 rad/µs · 4000 ns · R_b 9.1 µmCarbon-storage sites conflict on geology/pipeline reach; atom size = capacity value. Maximize stored capacity.
Weighted instance: site values map to per-atom detuning — on hardware this needs Vela-class local addressing. Emulated exactly here.
GTM talk track
'Two demos in one — screen the capture material, then site the storage. One is simulation, one is MIS.'
OGSM — product operating frame
Objective
Split into the sim and siting motions.
Goals
- One partner runs a siting instance
Strategies
- Run siting live now; sim on roadmap
Measures
- Sites selected
- Materials screened
OBR — outcome-based roadmap
| Horizon | Outcome we create | Buyer behavior change | Result we measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Now | Partner sees storage siting live | Prospect runs the emulated demo on their own instance data | Booked QPU-time evaluation or paid pilot |
| Next | Partner adds materials screening | Prospect co-designs a scoped benchmark against their incumbent solver | Documented crossover curve; expansion to production instances |
| Later | Partner runs both on QPU | Prospect standardizes on the workflow or buys an on-prem system | Recurring QPU consumption / system sale; reference case |
Fit notes (honesty gate)
Two problems in one: materials sim (T2) + storage siting (T1).
Ready to run this on real hardware?
Emulation-verified today — the same program runs on a Pasqal QPU unchanged.