T2W-MISPharmaceuticals & Healthcare
Clinical-trial site & cohort optimization
Select trial sites balancing geography and covariate coverage without redundancy — geographic + covariate conflict graph.
Sector
Healthcare / clinical operations
Likely buyer
CROs; pharma clinical ops
Hardware gate
Weighted → Vela
Taxonomy
resource-constrained × accelerating
Live demo — adiabatic sweep on 5 sites
Ω 9.4 · δ ±12.6 rad/µs · 4000 ns · R_b 9.1 µmTrial sites with overlapping catchments are redundant; atom size = enrollment value. Maximize distinct coverage.
Weighted instance: site values map to per-atom detuning — on hardware this needs Vela-class local addressing. Emulated exactly here.
GTM talk track
'Pick the trial sites that cover the most distinct patient populations without overlap.'
OGSM — product operating frame
Objective
Demonstrate site selection on trial geography.
Goals
- One CRO runs a trial map
Strategies
- Map coverage-conflict + value
Measures
- Enrollment coverage
- Site count
OBR — outcome-based roadmap
| Horizon | Outcome we create | Buyer behavior change | Result we measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Now | CRO sees selection on a map | Prospect runs the emulated demo on their own instance data | Booked QPU-time evaluation or paid pilot |
| Next | CRO benchmarks a real protocol | Prospect co-designs a scoped benchmark against their incumbent solver | Documented crossover curve; expansion to production instances |
| Later | CRO adopts for planning | Prospect standardizes on the workflow or buys an on-prem system | Recurring QPU consumption / system sale; reference case |
Fit notes (honesty gate)
Geographic + covariate conflicts; weighted by enrollment value.
Ready to run this on real hardware?
Emulation-verified today — the same program runs on a Pasqal QPU unchanged.