T1UD-MISEnergy & Utilities
Power-grid sensor (PMU) placement
Place phasor measurement units for full observability without redundant overlap — coverage-vs-conflict is geometric.
Sector
Energy / grid
Likely buyer
TSOs; grid operators
Hardware gate
Orion
Taxonomy
resource-constrained × enabling
Live demo — adiabatic sweep on 5 PMUs
Ω 9.4 · δ ±12.6 rad/µs · 4000 ns · R_b 9.1 µmPMUs with overlapping coverage are redundant; maximize distinct-coverage placement.
GTM talk track
'Full grid observability from the fewest, best-placed sensors.'
OGSM — product operating frame
Objective
Prove minimal-sensor full-observability placement.
Goals
- One TSO runs a network segment
Strategies
- Map observability graph to geometry
Measures
- Observability %
- Sensor count
OBR — outcome-based roadmap
| Horizon | Outcome we create | Buyer behavior change | Result we measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Now | TSO sees placement on a segment | Prospect runs the emulated demo on their own instance data | Booked QPU-time evaluation or paid pilot |
| Next | TSO benchmarks a regional grid | Prospect co-designs a scoped benchmark against their incumbent solver | Documented crossover curve; expansion to production instances |
| Later | TSO adopts for rollout planning | Prospect standardizes on the workflow or buys an on-prem system | Recurring QPU consumption / system sale; reference case |
Fit notes (honesty gate)
Observability coverage with placement conflicts — native.
Ready to run this on real hardware?
Emulation-verified today — the same program runs on a Pasqal QPU unchanged.