T3QUBO-EManufacturing
Production / job-shop scheduling
General job-shop scheduling — embeds poorly; classical wins today.
Sector
Manufacturing
Likely buyer
Manufacturers
Hardware gate
Classical MILP strong
Taxonomy
throughput-limited × cost-collapsing
No live demo yet — general scheduling embeds poorly; classical MILP wins. The paradigm-honest position: this use case is demonstrated with crossover analysis, not theater.
GTM talk track
Say classical.
OGSM — product operating frame
Objective
Watching brief.
Goals
- Monitor
Strategies
- Monitor
Measures
- N/A
OBR — outcome-based roadmap
| Horizon | Outcome we create | Buyer behavior change | Result we measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Now | Educate | Prospect runs the emulated demo on their own instance data | Booked QPU-time evaluation or paid pilot |
| Next | Revisit | Prospect co-designs a scoped benchmark against their incumbent solver | Documented crossover curve; expansion to production instances |
| Later | Reassess | Prospect standardizes on the workflow or buys an on-prem system | Recurring QPU consumption / system sale; reference case |
Fit notes (honesty gate)
General scheduling embeds poorly.
Ready to run this on real hardware?
Emulation-verified today — the same program runs on a Pasqal QPU unchanged.