T2QUBO-EEnergy & Utilities
Transmission network expansion planning
Where to build new lines — partly geometric, large instances; between native and embedding-taxed.
Sector
Energy / grid
Likely buyer
TSOs; regulators
Hardware gate
Hybrid; some native substructure
Taxonomy
cost-prohibitive × accelerating
No live demo yet — mixed; native substructure under investigation. The paradigm-honest position: this use case is demonstrated with crossover analysis, not theater.
GTM talk track
'Some of this is genuinely geometric — let's find the subproblem that fits.'
OGSM — product operating frame
Objective
Find the native substructure.
Goals
- Isolate a geometric subproblem
Strategies
- Decompose
Measures
- Subproblem quality
OBR — outcome-based roadmap
| Horizon | Outcome we create | Buyer behavior change | Result we measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Now | Scope a subproblem | Prospect runs the emulated demo on their own instance data | Booked QPU-time evaluation or paid pilot |
| Next | Benchmark it | Prospect co-designs a scoped benchmark against their incumbent solver | Documented crossover curve; expansion to production instances |
| Later | Integrate if it wins | Prospect standardizes on the workflow or buys an on-prem system | Recurring QPU consumption / system sale; reference case |
Fit notes (honesty gate)
Partly geometric; explore native subgraphs.
Ready to run this on real hardware?
Emulation-verified today — the same program runs on a Pasqal QPU unchanged.