T1UD-MISGovernment & Public SectorEnergy & Utilities
Water / utility network sensor & valve placement
Place sensors/valves for full network coverage without overlap — geometric coverage, like grid PMUs.
Sector
Utilities / water
Likely buyer
Water utilities; infrastructure operators
Hardware gate
Orion
Taxonomy
resource-constrained × enabling
Live demo — adiabatic sweep on 5 sensors
Ω 9.4 · δ ±12.6 rad/µs · 4000 ns · R_b 9.1 µmSensors with overlapping coverage are redundant; maximize distinct network coverage.
GTM talk track
'Monitor the whole network with the fewest, best-placed sensors.'
OGSM — product operating frame
Objective
Prove coverage placement for a water network.
Goals
- One utility runs a network
Strategies
- Reuse the coverage MIS kernel
Measures
- Coverage %
- Sensor count
OBR — outcome-based roadmap
| Horizon | Outcome we create | Buyer behavior change | Result we measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Now | Utility sees placement | Prospect runs the emulated demo on their own instance data | Booked QPU-time evaluation or paid pilot |
| Next | Utility benchmarks a network | Prospect co-designs a scoped benchmark against their incumbent solver | Documented crossover curve; expansion to production instances |
| Later | Utility adopts for rollout | Prospect standardizes on the workflow or buys an on-prem system | Recurring QPU consumption / system sale; reference case |
Fit notes (honesty gate)
Expanded-domain: same coverage MIS as grid PMUs.
Ready to run this on real hardware?
Emulation-verified today — the same program runs on a Pasqal QPU unchanged.