T1UD-MISTelecomManufacturing
Wireless-sensor / IoT gateway placement
Place gateways so coverage is maximized without co-channel interference — the same interference-radius MIS kernel as cell planning, different buyer.
Sector
Industrial IoT / private networks
Likely buyer
Industrial IoT integrators; private-5G operators
Hardware gate
Orion-class
Taxonomy
resource-constrained × accelerating
Live demo — adiabatic sweep on 5 gateways
Ω 9.4 · δ ±12.6 rad/µs · 4000 ns · R_b 9.1 µmGateways interfere if too close; maximize non-interfering coverage.
GTM talk track
'Same physics as cell planning, pointed at your factory floor.'
OGSM — product operating frame
Objective
Prove coverage-vs-interference optimization on a private-network deployment.
Goals
- One integrator runs a plant layout
Strategies
- Reuse the interference MIS kernel
- Bundle with private-5G proposals
Measures
- Coverage %
- Gateway count reduction
OBR — outcome-based roadmap
| Horizon | Outcome we create | Buyer behavior change | Result we measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Now | Integrator sees gateway placement on a plant map | Prospect runs the emulated demo on their own instance data | Booked QPU-time evaluation or paid pilot |
| Next | Integrator benchmarks a real facility | Prospect co-designs a scoped benchmark against their incumbent solver | Documented crossover curve; expansion to production instances |
| Later | Integrator standardizes the workflow | Prospect standardizes on the workflow or buys an on-prem system | Recurring QPU consumption / system sale; reference case |
Fit notes (honesty gate)
Reuses the interference/coverage MIS kernel; expanded-domain adjacency to cell planning.
Ready to run this on real hardware?
Emulation-verified today — the same program runs on a Pasqal QPU unchanged.